Reuters | By Kylie MacLellan
and Ben Hirschler
British lawmakers intend to
investigate U.S. drugmaker Pfizer's planned $100 billion takeover of British
rival AstraZeneca in a bid to ensure scientific research and jobs are
protected.
Members of the parliamentary business, innovation and skills committee are worried that the deal, which would be the
biggest-ever foreign acquisition of a British company, could threaten the
country's strategic interests.
"We will see how events
pan out over the next few days, but clearly given the scale of the proposed
merger it is important that we consider the impact not just on shareholders but
also on employees and the wider interests of the UK."
AstraZeneca, Britain's
second-biggest drugmaker behind GlaxoSmithKline, is an important part of the life sciences sector and employs nearly 7,000
staff in the country.
Politicians are wary of
foreign takeovers in the light of Kraft's 2010 acquisition of Cadbury, when the
U.S. food group promised to keep open a key factory, only to go back on the
pledge soon after the deal was completed.
"The committee previously
had a great deal of concern over the Cadbury takeover, so I think this is one
we will really have to closely analyse what is on offer," McKechin said.
Pfizer already has a tarnished
reputation in Britain after it announced plans in 2011 to shutter a major drug
research site in Sandwich, southern England, where Viagra was invented, with
the loss of nearly 2,000 jobs.
The U.S. firm says it views
Britain as an attractive location for both pharmaceutical research and
manufacturing - helped by recent government tax incentives - but cannot make
any firm commitments on future investment or jobs.
Pfizer Chief Executive Ian
Read is in Britain to lobby politicians and investors about his plans. The
government has so far adopted a neutral stance on the matter, but behind the
scenes officials are warning Pfizer against making draconian research job cuts,
industry sources said.
Pfizer has made two approaches
to AstraZeneca, both of which have been rebuffed. The company is widely
expected to come back with a revised offer before a May 26 deadline for it to
"put up or shut up" under UK takeover rules.